IamCraig.com Rotating Header Image

There is going to be an election in British Columbia next month

Yesterday, Premier David Eby called an election next month. You’d think the world had ended.

I really don’t understand all those people who think we’ll all be so “confused”. If you’re stupid enough to be confused, then you’re probably shouldn’t be qualified to vote. It’s as simple as that.

I can understand the Union of BC Municipalities asking the provincial government to hold off, but that’s all they could do, ask. The UBCM published a press release a few days ago entitled, “UBCM president calls for distinct local and provincial election periods“; that’s nice in principle, even highly desirable, but I don’t think it’s an absolute necessity at this time.

Eby frames, as he is wont to do, this election as being a reaction to trump and his tariffs. It’s a good excuse, but I don’t think he is being 100% accurate. He’s calling this election, now, two years before he is required to, because his main opposition, the Conservative Party of British Columbia, is in complete disarray … although they’ve managed to get their shit together somewhat now that their leader has resigned and the election has been called by accepting back into the party those party MLAs that were expelled in the last couple of months, except the one they attacked personally. (See my previous comments on why I don’t understand how gay people can possibly be conservatives.) And that’s the thing British Columbians need to remember; as long as I’ve been alive — and I assure you, that’s been a lot longer than most of you have — the conservatives have billed themselves as the “experienced” party, the one that has their shit together and the experience to run a government, and their opposition, whoever they are, as being … well, the opposite. But that old trope is an old trope, if you’ll excuse my redundancy. The NDP, in this case, has plenty of experience governing this province. Have they been 100% successful? No, not even close, but have the “conservative” parties, including the British Columbia Liberal Party, been any more successful? Again, not even close.

And that’s also the thing. Whether they’re called the British Columbia Liberal Party (which has nothing to do with the Liberal Party of Canada), the British Columbia Social Credit Party, BC United, One BC, the Conservative Party of British Columbia, CentreBC or any other charlatan party that claims to represent the conservative right, the conservative right is anything but united, and the use of the word (as in Alberta) is simply to try to deceive British Columbians (and Albertans) into believing that they have their shit together when a few minutes of observation will show exactly the opposite. But that’s OK, because British Columbians have quite cleverly found other parties who have done an admirable job of governing this province instead of the Socreds/Liberals/Conservatives/Centre.

Look, I’m not going to vote for the NDP, but I’m certainly not going to vote for the party (BC Conservatives) that showed their true colours when they personally attacked Elenore Sturko, one of their own MLAs! As when John Horgan called an election in 2020, I don’t really see the need to put British Columbians through an election at this time, especially over the objection of the UBCM, but I’m only a voter, so who cares what I think. I’ll obviously show up and do my citizen duty to mark my ballot, and I will, also as usual, do so for one of the lesser-known parties … the Green Party of British Columbia in this case.

The Greens suffer from the same libel as any non-conservative party, being decried as having no experience and not good enough to take on the big job of governing a region/province/country. I’m willing to give them that rope, and yank it back again in four years if necessary. They can’t do any worse than the Liberals/Conservatives have done in the past.

“Fake news”. Your language is fake, because you don’t know what it means

Congratulations. You invented a new phrase. (It only really took off in 2016.) But unlike “super intelligence”, this one has stuck.

“Fake news”, by your definition, in case you didn’t know, is any news you don’t like. If someone wrote a news story, “What does it mean that donald trump is a fascist?“, you’d consider that “fake news” just based on it’s title. The content of the story might be 100% true, but because you consider it “fake news”, you’d call it “fake news”, and ban “The New Yorker” from reporting from the White House.

If you were some nobody, in charge of running a pizza parlour down the road in the middle of Tennessee, nobody would care, but instead you’re the President of the United States. People, for some reason, look up to you and think that what you say has some import. But by calling real news “fake”, you’re doing yourself a disservice.

Why are you doing yourself and your country a disservice? Because you’re leading a nation of uneducated people (with some exceptions), kept uneducated by your shoddy education system, and the uneducated will follow your bidding and blindly vote for you. And you will win. And then you get to follow the similarly uneducated Supreme Court, who stupidly said that a sitting president can do no wrong. And you will make money … which is not supposed to be the point of politics. And you will have people stroke your ego in the same way that Natalie Harp does. It’s almost unbelievable for us to watch, but you have made it believable, as the above story says.

So you’ve abridged the First Amendment to your Constitution by barring three news organisations from the White House because you don’t like what they write about you and your administration: CNN, MS NOW and Politico. So that will result in you not getting honest feedback from the American people. Believe it or not, not everyone thinks you are doing an awesome job, despite what you say to all the uneducated people, who take what you say and don’t question it. So when you lose badly in your midterm elections (I hope), you will again trot out the same “rigged” bullshit you tried to use to convince everyone that you really won the 2020 election.

You live in your own twilight world, where everyone loves you. It’s bizarre.

I weep for your country. There’s still over two years of your bullshit left.

My brief submission to Ian Hanomansing’s “Cross Country Checkup” on CBC Radio

Ian Hanomansing’s first topic in his weekly radio show on CBC was, “Is Canada more like Europe than the United States? What’s at stake for you if Canada builds closer relations with the EU?”

I wasn’t going to wait on hold for half the day, so I used their submission form at https://www.cbc.ca/aircheck to submit my (unused) thoughts. Of course, I found out that there’s a length limit; not that my thoughts were millions of pages in length, but apparently 600 characters (not words) are long enough.

This is what I wrote:

I am an immigrant to Canada. I came here from southern Africa, a former British colony, 45+ years ago.

My simple answer to your question is that Canada is currently more like the United States. Unlike Australia, for example, which is more like Europe — the United Kingdom specifically — than the United States.

I don’t think what Europe is suggesting is full membership, hence the word associate, so talk about Brexit isn’t really relevant. I’m a dual Canadian/European citizen, so I don’t feel that there is anything “at stake” for me, but I feel closer to Europe, even though I’m just a few kilometres from the US border. And even though I’ve had a mail box in Blaine for years (which expired this year), I have refused to cross the border since 2025.

That’s 754 characters, but I deleted the last sentence to get in what little I could. I won’t bother making that mistake again; some people have ridiculous length limits on submissions.

To expand somewhat, because this is my own goddam blog and there are no length limits, I grew up in a former British colony, and I don’t apologise for using something closer to British English. I have no strong opinions on whether British English is the “correct” English, but it is my preference, just as many people have decided that the American version of the language is their preference. I know the American version is supposedly newer and makes more sense (to some people), but my personal opinion (if you’ll excuse my redundancy) is that it is lazy, and I don’t like lazy. This is especially true in Canada, where we’re right next to the States and 99% of the population just accepts the fact that the default in many computer programmes in multiple operating systems is to use American spelling, and so they will swear up and down that the correct spelling of “colour” is “color”, because they simply don’t know the difference. And that’s part of the reason why I hold that Canada is more like the United States.

And what’s “at stake” for me? I don’t think there’s really anything “at stake” for me. I like the fact that I am a dual citizen; I think of a few of my friends with even more than two citizenships and I am jealous. (I no longer qualify for citizenship in my country of birth, because I’m the wrong race.) I live in the 21st century where one’s citizenship isn’t primarily a statement about your loyalty; it’s just a piece of paper that one (or more) governments have decided to give you, and which entitles (or obligates) you to accept some rights or responsibilities. And if you don’t like some of those responsibilities, you can reject that citizenship. That’s a choice that most of the population doesn’t have, and so I realise I am privileged.

But this question is not about dual citizenship, but I still think that nothing is “at stake” for me. My business is international anyway, and it has nothing to do (directly) with my citizenship. If I really wanted to do business in the EU, I suppose I would research this supposed “associate membership” more and see how it could benefit me, but I don’t see how it would benefit me. Like 99% of any special offers you see on TV, it does nothing for me, and everything for whoever is pushing the offer on me. Thanks, but no thanks.

So there’s my answer in 2303 more characters. That’s all of 3.8 times as many as the 600 characters I was allowed. Phew! I’m exhausted.

Why the hell does trump come up with a new outrage every day?

On the list today is the latest “hoax” or “scam”. Both are single syllable words to fit into his memory buffer. The whole AI thing is a “hoax” because that (or “scam”) is the only adjective he can think of to describe anything he doesn’t like, such as criticism of his latest thought tangent. If you disagree with him, it’s obviously a “scam” or a “hoax” you’re pushing. Never mind that everyone else having the same thought about the current problems of AI are among the smartest people on the planet, it’s a hoax or a scam.

Nevermind that the Prime Minister of Canada is a trained economist, it’s apparently “laughable” that he’s trying to diversify Canada’s economy, and you’re going to attack the European Union if Carney so much as thinks about the possibility of maybe allying Canada with the EU.

You’re just a joke, donald trump, and America is yesterday’s ally. The fact that you have thousands of supporters telling you that you are wearing clothes is not proof that I am wrong, just that you have been successful at attracting so many stupid people; it’s kinda like the flies-to-shit analogy.

donald trump is such a liar

This statement would be questionable at best with just about any other person’s name, but with this person’s name, if you haven’t heard it proved, just wait 24 hours.

Exhibit A is one of his latest “Bullshit Social” posts, in which he states, “The only control or ‘guardrails’ that AI needs is a STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) PRESIDENT, and the U.S.A. has that, in spades!“.

(I’d link directly to his post, but “Bullshit Social” has taken a page out of Elon Musk’s book, and made it all but impossible to read their posts unless you sign up for an account, which I’m not going to do.)

Strong and smart? If one was using those adjectives to describe Barack Obama, or Ronald Reagan, sure, maybe most people would agree with you, but you, trump, don’t hold a candle to them. Anyone who has to pronounce themselves to be “STRONG AND SMART” (in capital letters, nogal) is quite clearly not.

And let’s think about what you’re talking about: AI. The second letter stands for “intelligence”, and no, I’m afraid you don’t have any intelligence. Yeah, you’re rich, but you got there despite your intelligence quotient (IQ). (Did you know “IQ” stood for “intelligence quotient”? There are no silent “B’s” in there.) You learnt to bullshit early, and, amazed by your success with it, you continued to use it, and now you’re fooling millions of people into voting for you. Smart you are not. Certainly not as smart as the people you are now calling “Conspiracy Theorists, Treasonists, Traitors, and Leakers”.

You’re tiring.

Exhibit B is your asking/telling Ukraine to stop attacking Russia’s refineries. Umm, Ukraine is at war, a war that Russia and putin started by invading their territory/country. With the exception of the Geneva Conventions, there are just about no rules to war. Even the Conventions I have referred to don’t hold any sway in this war because Russia kills civilians every single day, so they have thrown out that rule book. Why should Ukraine then be forced to hamstring themselves just to make you (trump) feel “strong and smart”? That’s not strong or smart at all.

You might think you are “strong and smart”, but more and more people are seeing through your subterfuge and your lies. That’s why so few people (33%, last time I looked) approve of the way you are fucking up your country.

I can’t wait until there is a grown-up in the White House again.

You’re tiring. Did I mention that?

Exhibit C: Pointing out how little you know about history, yes, a united Ireland would be great, but you’re not the first to conceive of such a possibility. It’s not some great idea that you, and you alone, have conceived. A dis-united Ireland has existed for hundreds of years, and it exists because of … history. So your waving your magic wand will not “solve” that problem.

Exhibit D: My final exhibit is the same as exhibit A, Ukraine. The wool has been pulled over your eyes by vladimir putin, who you allow to taunt NATO. Volodymr Zelenskyy has more smarts in his big toe than you and you son-in-law have combined. You don’t know what war is, or what it’s like to live at war. You have no business trying to settle the war according to some dreamed up criteria that you have.

You’re a joke.

Remembering when Canada stood by the United States of America … one of many times, except for the time we burned the White House

All day yesterday (actually, the day before yesterday in this blog’s time zone now), the world’s (or at least the Western World’s, or at least the North American) airwaves were full of retrospectives about September 11th, 2001 … 25 years ago.

In case you were under a rock that day, this was the day on which the United States of America suffered the worst terrorist attack in its history. Just under 3000 died that day (including Canadians and many other nationalities), and thousands of others have died since. Apparently, Howard Lutnick’s brother died that day. One can only assume that he must have believed the ludicrous and unproven assertion that the hijackers entered the United States via the Canadian border, as he clearly has a hate on for Canada, which he manifests through his support of donald trump’s juvenile tariffs on Canadian goods, and his trolling. One can only wonder why; there is no logical reason.

Former Canadian prime minister Jean Chrétien gave an excellent speech in Gander. He may have been talking generally, but he certainly made some pointed references to the current troubles between Canada and the United States in front of the very unpopular American ambassador, Pete Hoekstra. If Hoekstra had been listening and paying attention, he might have actually understood what Chrétien was saying to him and his boss, but subtlety is lost on Americans.

Anyway, it is not lost on me, as someone who was alive and in the aviation business in 2001 when this happened. I wasn’t flight crew, at that time, but my then-wife worked for Canadian Airlines at the time, and a friend of mine (who would later run for council in the City of Richmond, the city in which Vancouver International Airport is located, was involved with finding sleeping accommodations for the American travellers whose planes were denied entry to the United States, and who were stuck in Vancouver as a result. As it turns out, we didn’t have any space in our house at the time, but many others found beds.

But the point is, between Vancouver and Gander, and in many places in between, Canadians helped out our American friends on those terrible days, without pause for thought. And I know that, even today, while trump thinks of every which way to criticise Canada and blame us for all the troubles in his own country, we would do the same again, even knowing that. Because we also know that trump is unbalanced and only in power temporarily, and any thinking “principal officers of the executive departments” would invoke their 25th Amendment to their Constitution and remove him from power if they were, as I said about their ambassador, “listening and paying attention”, but only about half the citizens of the United States are lucid enough to understand the dangers into which trump puts them, and himself. So yes, we will again help our American friends if they need us in an hour of need, but we’ll only do so grudgingly, keeping in mind that since the last time, we have been mightily slighted.

That’s what you should think about, trump, as you burn every bridge to which you have access. And that’s what you should think about, Americans, as you go to the polls this November.

You’re a dumb fuck, trump

You’re so afraid, as you should be, that you’re going to lose your mid-term elections, that you feel you have to resort to bribing your electorate with cash. I have to admit, US$5000 would go down well right about now, if I was an unfortunate American citizen, but the price of having to put up with Republicans governing my country would be too much.

And anyway, for most American citizens, who have been living so close to the edge during your tenure so far, every penny of those $5000 would go to a bank to pay off credit cards, so it’s a win/win situation for you and your buddies at the banks, who will turn around and give you that $5000 right back in donations (making it a net theft right from your own treasury). It’s a sad situation in which you and the rest of Americans live. If only you had a politician who cared enough about the real people that to do something about it.

But let’s not get ahead of ourselves. In 2024 I honestly thought that Americans couldn’t possibly make the same mistake twice, and yet that was exactly what they did. Well, that’s one thing you Yanks are good at, pushing the envelope; let’s see if, after years of watching you fuck up long-held relationships and upend world order (and not in a good way) the American electorate is really stupid enough to give you more rope to hang yourself.

The Argies are at it again

Andy Burnham, between Leopoldo Galtieri and Javier Milei

Andy Burnham, between Leopoldo Galtieri and Javier Milei.

As if the world didn’t have enough problems, yesterday the president of Argentina, Javier Milei, gave a speech puffing out his chest because he has the school bully, donald trump, in his corner because the UK didn’t support him in his war against Iran. As I said earlier, this is what international diplomacy has become in the modern age: petty tit-for-tat personal scores to settle. It doesn’t matter that the UK and the US supposedly have a “special relationship” or that NATO is a defensive alliance, not an offensive alliance, today I am supporting my “friend” in Argentina, because he’s as short-sighted as me, and together we can cause maximum harm to the most people in the world, with our short-sighted, jingoistic policies that we use to gin up our bases.

It’s very tiring.

All I can say is that I hope Andy Burnham wakes up in a mood to slap down Milei’s jumped up impetuousness. Argentina is in a better economic, financial and democratic position than it was in 1982, but using trump as an excuse for his trump-like behaviour will only get him into trouble again, as it did with Galtieri when he attempted to assert Argentina’s claim on the Falklands. Milei doesn’t realise that he is just being used by trump to make him look good in his upcoming mid-term elections.

Here we go again. *sigh*

Oh my god, you people (donald trump and co.) are dumb as posts. I don’t even know why I’m addressing you directly, but you waste your presidential time trolling social media, instead of doing more presidential things, like figuring out how to extract yourself from the dumb war that you started with Iran. It has turned into a “forever war”, and a foreign one at that.

  • You purposely pushed Canada, and then ended the trade talks because you apparently don’t know anything about “the art of the deal”.
  • You then posted a bunch of juvenile memes about Canada.
  • You then renamed your side of Lake Ontario to Lake America.
  • Your Trade Secretary then made a hilarious (not!) joke about Canada sicking two old civilian submarines on you. They don’t even exist any more; so much for your intelligence.
  • Your Defence (or War) Secretary then made a joke at the expense of two minor (as in children) civilian Army cadets. Again, so much for your intelligence.
  • Then one of your admirals prevaricated when asked if he’d obey an order to attack Canada.

Do you remember a time when vladimir putin told the whole world, as he massed his troops on the border of Ukraine, that they were exaggerating and prevaricating when they accused him of preparing to invade Ukraine? I don’t even think you need to read anything to know that; it’s common knowledge among anyone who was alive and lucid in 2022.

Well, we and our minor cadets await your invasion. If you think Red Dawn from 1984 was just a fictional film, you’re about to discover the reality.

Ad blocking

The lengths to which “publishers” will go to publish ads on the web is pretty infuriating sometimes. “Publishers” in this sense are people like me, publishing stuff on the web, whether it’s my opinion on what the dickheads of the world are up to as they try to ruin this planet, or information on how your app works or the news of the world. All of that is useful information, often that shows up as search results, and I suppose it’s legitimate for the publishers of that information to expect to be paid for that information commensurate with what they have to pay data centres for bandwidth and (in the case of the BBC) stationing journalists all over the world to report on news.

But it’s also reasonable for me, as the owner of the device of which said ads are being displayed, to restrict publishers from using the cycles of my device’s CPU to sell their products or services or the bandwidth that I have to pay my ISP to download their ads. The latter is not insignificant.

And that is what I have done for years.

For many years I have used the “hosts” file at winhelp2002.mvps.org. Unfortunately, the guy who used to run that appears to have died. I did donate to his project (back when I had money) and, when his medical problems became clear, offered to help and (if necessary) take over the project, but he never replied to my email. Now that he’s gone, his file has languished un-updated since March 2021, and yet the world has moved on in the five years since then. Advertisers register new domains every day to serve up their ads, and so I see new ads occasionally because their new domains aren’t blocked.

I’m convinced that I don’t see half of the crap online that most people see. I credit the “Criteria for detection for the MVPS HOSTS File” for this, and the fact that I can (and do) edit my own HOSTS file to blackhole domains of my choice.

The one thing I have never done is use a program like Pi-hole to block advertising on my whole network, including my cell (mobile) phones and tablets and the devices of everyone in my household. It’s not because I’m morally opposed to using them, but because I feel I have more control over the “hosts” file on my own machine. I have a script that very quickly moves my “hosts” file out of the way and puts in my default “hosts” file, and I don’t know how I’d accomplish that same thing on a network-connected device, such as a router. It will be the first thing I research if I ever do something to move into the modern world of ad blocking.

I’m also worried that doing so might negatively affect how some apps operate, but you don’t know until you try. If you have experience using a mainstream (Android or Iphone) device on a Pi-holed network, I’d be interested in your opinion. Changing my phone to a non-mainstream type is another thing I plan to try before I die.

Speaking of the lengths to which “publishers” — in this case actually the advertisers — will go, they register domains and just park generic pages at the root of the domain. Here’s one of them:

ill-fatedodd.com screenshot

ill-fatedodd.com screenshot.

(If you’re not blocking advertising domains, you can see this page in full at 3.stg.ill-fatedodd.com. Here’s another one from another company: www.chaseherbalpasty.com.)

In their verbiage, they refer to a laughable “legal notice” — they title the page as a “Notice for cybersecurity professionals” — where they plead for their domain not to be blocked:

Any attempt to bypass or interfere with a website’s intended functionality or technical protection measures (including adding this domain to a blocklist) may violate the DMCA and the publisher’s Terms of Service, and may result in restricted access to the service.

Publishers delivering ads through this domain reserve the right to take necessary actions, in accordance with applicable laws and policies, to ensure the stable provision of services.

In other words, “Please, pretty please, don’t block our advertising.” If I operated a huge network and I didn’t want to inconvenience (or support) my users, I’d probably pay attention to this notice. But if I’m just trying to block advertising on my own computer (and possibly, in the future, my own small network), this is inconsequential to me. Only once in my life have I run into a situation where a business seemed to rely on an advertising domain in my blacklist to achieve some sort of function that blocked me from logging into my pre-existing account, and for those of you who work in this business, it won’t surprise you that that business was Godaddy. But they must have stopped using that blacklisted domain at some point, because after using my naked “hosts” file to get around the problem for a while, I eventually seemed able to log into their website with my full blacklist in place. No harm, no foul; I got to carry on blocking advertising and I got to carry on using my Godaddy account.

One consequence of this block, for me, is that I either have no or a very sparse profile with advertisers. I just don’t exist in their books. If you think, “Well, I hardly ever browse the Web, so they’ve got nothing on me,” then you’re wrong. They do. Even in my case, I received an email from a cousin (who uses a gmail.com address) that referred to Calgary Airport, and the same day I saw advertising for parking at Calgary Airport in an environment where I can’t currently block advertising (an Android phone). Gee, I wonder where Google made that connection?! I was also one of those suckers who used to have a very high opinion of Google, and so I was delighted one day to get an “invitation” to sign up for a Gmail address. I created, but never did use my account, except for one occasion on which I sent an email to a friend because my own mail server was down that day. One person, one email message! And yet, years later when I decided to close the account, I found that Gmail had created a hidden address book for me of dozens of people I knew! With their real email address! That I had never used with that account! And how the fuck did Gmail know that Bob Smith was my friend?! There was nobody in that hidden address book that I didn’t know, but none of them had ever received an email message from that address or had ever sent one to that address!

In another case, I broke my own rules and signed-up for a Facebook account because we were looking for a rental apartment, and we were told by “the kids” in the know that anything in the rental market happens in Facebook Marketplace. While I was in the first sign-up process, my application was blocked and my account suspended for “violating community guidelines”, even though I couldn’t have done so in the seven-tenths of a second I was a member. My second attempt a couple of weeks later was also unsuccessful and suspended for the same reason, even though the only thing I had managed to do was create an avatar. I’ve since been told that I was suspended because I didn’t make any “friends”, but that’s just speculation, not from the horse’s mouth. I think it’s more likely that, because I had (and have) facebook.com in my blacklist for the other 23.5 hours of the day I use the Internet, I looked suspicious to Facebook because I simply didn’t exist. No problem. I managed to find rental accommodation the old fashioned way (word of mouth), and to this day I have facebook.com (and other associated domains) blocked on my computer. No loss to me.

On the other hand, on the rare occasions I do see advertising, it is strangely apparent to me that they do know who I am. Is it just a coincidence that I see adverts for middle-age men, instead of (for example) skin creams for young 20-year-old women? No, sadly, it’s probably not a coincidence. Yes, I do have a prostate, thank-you very much, and yes it has been checked lately.

What this long (and meandering towards the end) post is supposed to communicate, is that it is possible (to a large extent, although not fully) to hide from advertisers and the purveyors of other crap, largely conspiracy theories. The impetus for this post is everything that is in the news these days (even tonight) about people, particularly kids, being subject to the whims of advertisers, whether those advertisers are advertising the latest skin cream (as mentioned above) or the latest conspiracy theory about Alberta separation, who really killed JFK, which race is really the master race or whether or not women should be kept barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen! My using blocks of huge (over 10 000 at this point) lists of blacklisted domains and just staying away from social media (easy for some of us to do) is a recipe for success for me. My IP address isn’t hidden from anyone, as the Vancouver Police Department has personally informed me, so I’m obviously not doing anything illegal, but I am obviously doing the best I can to hide myself from “surveillance capitalism”. And my success is seeing, on the news, that I’m not suffering from the same mental maladies that it seems afflict 90% of the rest of society.

Where this doesn’t help me is in dealing with friends who have become susceptible to the sewage they are fed. Unfortunately, having swallowed the Kool-Aid, they then assume that I have swallowed different Kool-Aid, and they completely discount my opinions. Two of my trump-supporting friends have ended a total of about eighty years worth of friendships with me recently because I won’t bow down and admit how great trump is. It’s shocking to me. That should cause me to have mental problems, not the sewage I don’t subject myself to online.

And to do this I am not restricting myself in any way. I (and my computer) do not load certain domains, and by not loading those domains my computer and Internet connection are faster and I am not subjected to the same sewage that the rest of the population is fed. In the famous words of donald trump, “Nothing bad can happen, it can only good happen.”